Failure Rate for Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Leads on the Rise

Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator leads could couldwhen the device fails to regulate the heart beat
reach a 30% failure rate over the next four yearsproperly.
according to a new study published by UBSA number of Medtronic Defibrillator Lead Lawsuits
Investment Research.were filed on behalf of individuals who have had the
Medtronic defibrillator leads were implanted in moreleads implanted, however in 2008, the Supreme Court
than 260,000 patients world-wide before it wasruled in Reigel vs. Medtronic that Medtronic is free
recalled due to safety concerns by its manufacturerfrom liability for the faulty devices since the
in October 2007. Initial studies claimed the failure rateMedtronic Defibrillator Leads were approved by the
was only 3%, however recent studies point that theU.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
failure rate could increase dramatically as the devicesAlthough many patients are appealing the Supreme
age. For patients who do not have health insurance,Court decision, many patients are still left with the
replacing a malfunctioning defibrillator can be veryfinancial burden of replacing a defective device. The
expensive.United States Congress has proposed the Medical
Medical devices, such as implantable cardioverterDevice Safety Act of 2009 as an attempt to
defibrillators (ICDs) or a cardiac resynchronizationoverturn the Supreme Court decision.
therapy-defibrillators (CRT-Ds) use defibrillator leadsFurthermore, the FDA has been under scrutiny by
as a functioning part of the device. Similar to athe Government Accountability Office (GAO) who
pacemaker, ICDs and CRT-Ds are surgically implantedhas found the FDA approval process is not sufficient
devices that monitor a patients heart rate andenough to insure medical device safety. The
administer small electrical shocks to the heart in orderMedtronic Defibrillator Lead was subjected to a
to jolt it back to normal functioning. Although defectspremarket notification process, which determines if
are generally rare, routine maintenance is required tothe new device is equivalent to an existing roduct on
ensure the lead is functioning properly, especially asthe market rather than a more stringent premarket
the device ages.approval process (PMA). Federal law requires that all
The safety recall was issued in 2007 after a studyhigh risk Class III medical devices, including implantable
found the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator leads were pronedevices such as defibrillator leads, undergo a PMA
to breaking inside the patients' body at an alarminglyprocess, however both the GAO and FDA agree that
high rate. A malfunctioning lead can causethe FDA is far from meeting the goal.
unnecessary electric shocks, or worse, cardiac arrest